John Monnier, April 2001
In anticipation of sending 4 pads to Specialty Components, a careful assessment of all existing pads was performed. I will now report on the results.
For each pad, the following test were done:
1. They were checked for air Leaks (Yes/NO)
2. They were checked for vibrations (Yes/No/Small) by supplying pad
with air and pushing down on a smooth granite surface.
3. All 10 pads were ranked based on visual inspection by JDMonnier,
EPedretti, and Marc Lacasse independently.
4. A collective rank was assigned based on average rank [in the final
assessment, a few deep grooves were considered worse than many shallow
grooves]
Ranks [1=best, 10=worst]
ID# (prev.loc) | Leak? | Vibrate? | JDM | EP | ML | Collective |
*00002 (2S) | No | Yes | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
*A0110 (1T) | No | No | 10 | 5 | 10 | 9 |
*A0111 (1T) | No | Yes | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
00004 (1S) | No | No | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6/7 |
00005 (1S) | No | No | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6/7 |
*A0109 (2T) | No | Small | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
00003 (2S) | No | No | 4 | 9 | 3 | 4 |
IOTA1 (2T) | No | No | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
A0119 (1BIG) | No | No | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
IOTA2 (2BIG) | No | No | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
[key for prev(ious).loc.(ation): (delay line #)(S=Side, T=Top,
B=BIGtop)]
[Recall Table 1 was the problematic one]
As you can see there was a fair amount of agreement between the 3 judges, and that 4 of the 5 worst pads were on Table 1, including one badly vibrating top pad.
The asterisked-pads above are the ones we are sending for refurbishment
based on the following 3 criteria:
1) If the pad vibrated on the granite block, then refurbishment was
considered necessary.
2) Few deep grooves were considered worse than many light grooves
3) A0110 was on Table 1 which was giving us so much trouble, and so
broke the tie for 4th place.
I also suggest that Pads 00004, 00005 and 00003 are replaced with the nice spares for next run since they are quite scratched, but nothing too deep. [please inspect for yourself]
Airpad Info
Table 1: old table (NORTH)
Table 2: new table (SOUTH)
e.g, Location 1T: table 1 on TOP
[ BIG == the big one on top ]
Location
2S: table 2 on SIDE
ID Location
Description /
# Date, Table
# Condition
A0119 2001Mar, 1BIG 2
stubs one, 2 on the other, 2 on side
Many scratches -- much worse than the other
Grade A/B
A0110 2001Mar, 1T
Two stubs on each end
Long grooves on surface -- deep
mostly near one edge
Grade: D
A0111 2001Mar, 1T
Two stubs on each end
long grooves on surface -- deep
but not too many..
mostly near one edge
Grade: C
00005 2001Mar, 1S
4 stubs on one end, 2 the other
light longitudinal scratches
looks more beat up, dings, dents
Grade: C
00004 2001Mar, 1S
4 stubs on one end, 2 the other
light longitudinal scratches
and some transverse scratching
beat up w/ dings, dents
Grade: C
-------
IOTA2 2001Mar, 2BIG 4
stubs one end, 2 the other
Light scratches, some air ports are
red.
Grade: A
A0109 2001Mar, 2T
Two stubs on each end
Lots of light long scratches
Grade: B/C
IOTA1 2001Mar, 2T
Two stubs on each end
Mostly nice surface, only a few
longitudinal scratches
I think this is a new one
Grade: A
00003 2001Mar, 2S
4 stubs on one end, 2 the other
longitudinal scratches
Grade: C
00002 2001Mar, 2S
4 stubs on one end, 2 the other
longitudinal scratches -- deeper
Grade: D
--------
IOTA3 2001Mar, SPARE 4 holes
on each end
[00004]
no stubs in place and not set screws
Perfect shape -- brand new
Grade: A+
00001 2001Mar, SPARE 4 holes
on each end
no stubs in place and not set screws
Perfect shape -- brand new
Grade: A+
IOTA4 2001Mar, SPARE 2 holes
on one end, 4 the other
[00001]
ALL filled with set screws.
Great Shape.. Came with small chart of
displacement vs. load: 80psi,80lb ok
Grade: A+
IOTA5 2000Dec, LD2
Removed
[00002] 2002Dec, SPARE Polished by WT to
9 fringes,
0.11/1000" P-P
Visually looks great.
2 holes one side, 4 the other
missing all stubs and set screws.
Grade: A
IOTA6 2000, LD1
Removed by CP and polished at Harvard
::CP
has it failed -- vibrated excessively
CP still has this one
-not labeled
AIRPAD Parts: We have a box of stubs, set screws, and air-line connectors.